AVO Logo
Site Map | FAQ |
Alaska Volcano Observatory
Introduction | Reference Search | Glossary 
You are here: Home > Library > Correlation of the Holocene Jarvis Creek, Tangle Lakes, Cantwell, and Hayes tephras in south-central and central Alaska

CORRELATION OF THE HOLOCENE JARVIS CREEK, TANGLE LAKES, CANTWELL, AND HAYES TEPHRAS IN SOUTH-CENTRAL AND CENTRAL ALASKA
citation imageBeget, J. E., Reger, R. D., Pinney, DeAnne, Gillispie, Tom, and Campbell, Kathy, 1991, Correlation of the Holocene Jarvis Creek, Tangle Lakes, Cantwell, and Hayes tephras in south-central and central Alaska: Quaternary Research, v. 35, n. 2, p. 174-189.

DATA TABLES *Not all tables in a publication may be listed. Not all tables from a publication have data entered in the database.
3081: Table 3: Geochemical Analyses of Jarvis Creek, Tangle Lakes, Cantwell, and Proximal Hayes Tephras
View table data :: Download table data (.csv)
* Note. Analyses of Jarvis Creek, Tangle Lakes, and Cantwell tephra by Jim Beget, DeAnne Pinney, Mary Keskinen, Dianne Johnson, and Scott Cornelius. Analyses carried out on the Washington State University Cameca MBX microprobe. Standards used were CCNM-211 (obsidian), K-411 (NBS glass for Mg, Ca) and KCl (CMTB-2 for Cl). Analytical conditions: 15 kV, 13.5 nA, 8 micron beam, 10-sec counting time. Total Fe reported as Fe2O3. Major element analysis are normalized to 100%. (-) Not determined or not reported. Analytical conditions for proximal Hayes tephra reported in Riehle (1985). Hayes tephra sample numbers cited from Riehle er nl. (1990). Numbers from tephra sequence in this table used in Figure 1. *

SAMPLES
Contact AVO Privacy Accessibility Information Quality FOIA
URL: avo.alaska.edu/downloads/reference.php
Page modified: June 22, 2022 08:39
Contact Information: AVO Web Team

twitter @alaska_avo
facebook alaska.avo
email Receive volcano updates by email: USGS VNS

This website is supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Cooperative Agreement Grant G22AC00137

Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.